We had a small group meeting this month due to illness, holidays and tradesmen appointments. However there was much to discuss and we spent some time talking about Michael's history class assignments on various topics of the origins of the Second World War. Included in this months Blog we have an article by Iris Brindley on Chamberlain's role in Appeasement. Michael's comments were:
'A very pleasing essay which effectively examined the issues in a well organised and highly readable manner.'
Well done Iris and everyone who contributed can give themselves a pat on the back, I think we can all agree that Michael's class was very challenging but stimulating and edifying in the continuous controversial origins of the Second World War. An interesting account of how Tyneside fared during the war can be found in Craig Armstrong's book Tyneside in the Second World War.
Here is a review from Google Books:
The Second World War remains one of the great communal memories of British Society, yet the majority of writing on the Home Front has been descriptions focusing on the south of England. Accounts of the war in the provinces remain few and Tyneside, as an industrial powerhouse, was responsible for producing vast amounts of material and equipment and was an area of vital significance to the national war effort. Although the cosy image that has formed around the stoic acceptance of the British people to wartime strictures has been questioned in some recent works, this book seeks to analyse how the government, local authorities, voluntary organisations, police and others attempted both to improve and assess morale on Tyneside. Looking at a variety of issues to give an academic overview of how Total War affected provincial communities, this work seeks to analyse the overall effect of the Second World War on Tyneside.
You can get it from Amazon, Waterstones, W H Smith, Blackwell for £17.99 but I got my copy much cheaper at The Works and you may be able to get it on offer at the City Library.
The next meeting will be held at the Hancock Museum 10:30 upstairs cafe on Wednesday April 6, please bring along any material you wish to discuss.
Things to do
Get on the Metro and take a a hike around Cullercoats and follow the Art Trail, you can download the informative leaflet from here:
Art Trail
I can reccomend the Cafe on the corner opposite the Dove Marine Centre its called Beaches and Cream and has just been redecorated, a nice resting place.
Or you can go to North Tyneside Council Web site to find out more heritage walks:
I can recommend this poetry workshop by Anna Woodcroft, I went to a venue at the City Library a few years ago when Ann Woodcroft and Linda France gave us an introduction to contemporary poetry, do not worry you do not have to write anything but taking notes is useful as its very informative, you get to read some short poetry from a variety of sources, many modern day snippets some from people who have just started to express themselves who come from all walks of life. Make sure to get Anna's book Birdhouse she will no doubt have a few to sell very reasonably priced and I am sure she will sign it just like the one I have.
A little bit brief this month but you can help just get researching and see you at the next meeting.
Derek
IRIS BRINDLEY
CHAMBERLAlN'S ROLE IN APPEASEMENT
Introduction:
Appeasement is a diplomatic policy, attempting to make
political or material concessions to the enemy power, in an effort to avoid
further conflict. My aim is to explain Neville Chamberlain as a man and his role in
the failed effort of appeasement in 1937, its failure and why it failed.
Neville Chamberlain originally gained a hands-on reputation
as a manager of a 20,000-acre estate in the Bahamas, he had a strong interest
in the running affairs of business and became a leading manufacturer in
Birmingham on his return to the UK. He was elected in that City as a
Councillor, going on to be Lord Mayor in 1915. He rose to Director General of the
Department of National Service too, though resigned in a year due to
bitterness between David Lloyd George and himself. Perhaps a sign that he was
not an easy man to get along with.
Neville Chamberlain preceded Stanley Baldwin to become Prime
Minister from 28 May 1937 until 10 May 1940. Hitler and all of Germany,
even right thinking British people, thought the Versailles Treaty, written after
the 1 World war was punitive and unfair, seemingly bent on totally crushing
and punishing Germany for their part in that war. Chamberlain being a
peace making man believed totally in appeasement and wanted at all costs to
avoid another war. Indeed, he publicly spoke of his horror at the thought of
the death and destruction of war, in fact one famous broadcast by him on
27 September 1937 he famously said ‘the prospect of war looming in front of him
was indeed "Horrible, fantastic, incredible" that Londoners would be
‘digging ditches and trying on gas masks here because of a quarrel in a
far-away country between people of whom we know nothing’
Hitler made war inevitable by flouting the Versailles Treaty
constantly, breaking peace-making promises which he had never ever had
any intention of keeping and deliberately marching ever onward, taking over
land he considered rightly belonged to Germany. Chamberlain wanted
to avoid war at all cost and was seen by many due to his appeasement stance,
as ineffective and by the time he tried to take the initiative, it was too late.
Hitler had risen to great power in Germany and had the perhaps rightly
aggrieved population behind him. Despite settlement being reached at the Munich
Agreement between Germany, Britain, France and Italy, which permitted
German annexation of Sudetenland, Hitler then planned to take
Czechoslovakia and the Czechs looked to France for military assistance as they
had an alliance with them, the Soviets also had a treaty with the Czechs and were
willing to step in with France and Britain if they came to Czechoslovakia's
defence the Soviets were ignored and neither Britain nor France were prepared to
defend Czechoslovakia.
Both wanted to avoid military confrontation
with Germany at almost ANY cost. Chamberlain offered to go back to speak
personally to the Fuhrer and Hitler again made an agreement of no military
action without further discussion. A further meeting was held in London
with the French head of state and a proposal stipulating all areas with more than
50% Sudeten Germans be returned to Germany. The Czechs were not
consulted but were reluctantly forced to accept on 21 September. Chamberlain
STILL believing in appeasement was horrified to find Hitler again wanted more
than previously agreed and a new proposal was put to the Czechs who
understandably rejected it, as did the French and the British cabinet.
Chamberlain proposed a four power conference immediately to
settle the dispute, Hitler, Chamberlain, Daladier and Mussolini met in
Munich. Mussolini produced a written plan accepted by all which was called the
Munich Agreement. Czechoslovakia was informed to either resist
Germany alone or submit. They submitted. Before leaving Munich, Chamberlain
and Hitler signed a paper resolving to peacefully settle their differences
through consultation. When back on British soil Chamberlain told the public he had
achieved "Peace with Honour. I believe it is peace for our time”. His words
were immediately challenged by Churchill who said "You were given the
choice between War or Dishonour. You chose Dishonour and you WILL have War! This
proved true the
following year. The Munich Agreement became a byword for the
futility of appeasing totalitarian states.
Conclusion:
Though Chamberlains efforts of appeasement had failed, being
an unmovable man of fixed ideas and beliefs, he insisted on having his
‘own way’, refusing to countenance advice from others even dismissing them, or
forcing their resignation. This made him a formidable politician, but one
with a closed mind and perhaps naive. I believe he was often self-deluded
but perhaps he was privy to the knowledge that Britain had neither the
monetary resources nor military capability to go to, war at that time?
Following the Munich Agreement he believed he had won” Peace for our time"
because of diplomatic persuasion and could not see that all it did was
feed Hitler's megalomania and enormous appetite for territories new. All
that Chamberlain's Appeasement did was strengthen Hitler’s
political position. The appeasement failed because he had no understanding of the
psychology of a Dictator, Hitler came to expect an utter lack of resistance
to his acquisitions from both Britain AND France who had through their inaction
effectively ‘encouraged’ further aggression. l believe Chamberlain died
in 9 November 1940 six months after retiring perhaps a broken man.
Works cited
Book (on internet) Origins of the second world war A.J.P
TAYLOR
Encyclopaedia Britannica (on internet)
BBC — GCSE Bitesize History” Why appeasement"?
(internet)
Class Handout "Appeasement" (Perspectives) Richard
Cockett